Home India World Religion Dewanism Hinduism Christianity Islam Technology Gaschamber Literature Poetry Love Youtube Pictures Trash Hindu links Main links Forum links Publishing Public Letters Guestbook00 Disclaimer Contact

Critical Podium Dewanand


Knowledge and Psychology needed if we are to destroy Islam

Sacrificer           unknown
Sacrifice code       wfor0377
Sacrifice date       25 march 2009

Knowledge and Psychology needed if we are to destroy Islam

Muhammad was stressed-out, helpless, and lazy. He was a miser. Never
having actually earned a dime in his life, Muhammad had no way to
value capital or labor. He was always in debt, no matter how much he
stole. The economic plight of the Islamic world is a direct result of
Muhammad's unwillingness to engage in honest work. It is why the
Islamic nations remain the world's least productive. In fact, Muslims
as a whole are destructive economically, stifling far more commerce
than they inspire.

And that's because their leader was a pirate. Islam was financed
by stolen booty and the slave trade. As parasites, they survived by
sucking every productive host within a camel's ride dry. The Bedouins
of Arabia were poor, and while the Jews were a tasty treat, Islam
would soon sink its fangs into a more plentiful prey. Within a year,
Muhammad would attack the Byzantines. Within three, his Companions
would subdue Arabia in the War of Compulsion, taxing everyone. Within
a decade the first Muslims would conquer Yemen, Persia, Egypt, Syria,
and Judea. Within a century, the sword of Islam would be wielded
above the necks of millions. And it was all for money. They plundered
and raped to be sure, but their principle tools were the zakat and
jizyah taxes, which they imposed on all people rich and poor.

But most of all, Muhammad was coward, as are all Islamic imams
today. They are ever ready to send others to their death, but never
willing to fight themselves. They corrupt boys with promises of
virginal rewards while they remain in the comfort and safety of
mosque and madrasa. Like most loud-mouthed bullies, Muhammad, and
those who followed him, found pleasure in tormenting the defenseless.
And with each passing day it became evident that Muhammad had
lost control of himself and that he was "overcome by men." The Medina
surahs have been fixated on attacking deserters. Orders to submit and
obey dominate his final revelations. As men sought freedom and peace,
Muhammad reacted by becoming more dictatorial and warlike. As a
result, Islamic nations are the least-free places on earth. In the
land of submission there are no true democracies, no freedom of
religion, of the press, of speech, or travel. One billion Muslims
struggle to survive in countries brutalized by tyrants and dictators.
And it's not hard to see why. The first Muslims emulated their
warlord, becoming increasingly belligerent, callous, and brutal.

So, that leads us to a very unattractive place. As a direct
result of Muhammad's personal failings the Islamic world is devoid of
everything civilized people hold dear. Muslims wallow in poverty.
Life isn't worth living. They have no freedom of speech or religion.
With the educational process focused on Qur'anic studies, Muslims are
among the most poorly educated and most indoctrinated people on
earth. Following the example of a perverted sexist, Muslim men abuse
women. And they are violent. Twenty percent of the world's population
is responsible for ninety percent of the planet's upheaval-terror and
war. If only twenty percent of Muslims are "good" ones, then Islam
makes them 2000% more violent than the rest of us. Frankly, I don't
see any benefit to any of this. Islam is a liability the world could
easily do without.

In the "Prologue" I shared a pair of quotes from Islamic
scholars. This might be a good time to review them in context of what
we have learned. What may have once seemed extreme will now appear
understated. Here is what Dr. D.S. Margoliouth had to say: "The
character attributed to Muhammad in the biography of Ibn Ishaq is
exceedingly unfavorable. In order to gain his ends Muhammad recoils
from no expedient, and he approves of similar unscrupulousness on the
part of his adherents, when exercised in his interest… He organizes
assassinations and wholesale massacres. His career as the tyrant of
Medina is that of a robber chief whose political economy consists of
securing and dividing plunder…. He is himself an unbridled libertine
[morally and sexually unrestrained] and encourages the same passion
in his followers. For whatever he does he is prepared to plead the
express authorization of his deity. It is, however, impossible to
find any Islamic religious doctrine which he is not prepared to
abandon in order to secure a political end. At different points in
his career he abandons the unity of God and his claim to the title of
Prophet. This is a disagreeable picture for the founder of a
religion, and it cannot be pleaded that it is a picture drawn by an

Renan wrote: "Muslims were the first victims of Islam. Many times
I have observed that fanaticism comes from a small number of
dangerous men who maintain others in the practice of this religion by
terror. To liberate the Muslim from his religion is the best service
that one can render him."

Considering the nature of their prophet, it should be no surprise
that the Islamic world is such a mess.

Bukhari:V4B52N143 /V5B59N523 "When we reached Khaybar, Muhammad said
that Allah had enabled him to conquer them. It was then that the
beauty of Safiyah was described to him. Her husband had been killed
[actually brutalized], so Allah's Apostle selected her for himself.
He took her along with him till we reached a place called Sad where
her menses were over and he took her for his wife, consummating his
marriage to her, and forcing her to wear the veil.'"

Bukhari:V5B59N524 "The Muslims said among themselves, `Will
Safiyah be one of the Prophet's wives or just a lady captive and one
of his possessions?'" Muhammad was guilty of every sex crime known to
man: pedophilia, incest, rape, polygamy, adultery, womanizing,
fornication, sexism, and abetting prostitution. Worst of all, he
rewarded his mercenaries by dividing captured young girls among them.
It's little wonder his Qur'anic paradise was so perverted.

The Sira reports: Ishaq:517 "When the Apostle married [using a
word designed to convey the nature of a moral and loving relationship
to this situation is repulsive] Safiyah on his way out of town, she
was beautified and combed, putting her in a fitting state for the
Messenger. The Apostle passed the night with her in his tent. Abu
Ayyub, girt with his sword, guarded the Apostle, going round the tent
until he saw him emerge in the morning. Abu said, `I was afraid for
you with this woman for you have killed her father, her husband, and
her people." As an interesting aside, Safiyah, like Jewish Juwayriyah
(the sex slave before her), bore the identity of her God in her name.
Imagine for a moment, being Safiyah. You awaken one morning to
find a gang of godless pirates prowling the outskirts of your town.
After rattling their sabers, you witness thousands of them performing
a prostration "prayer." You recognize them, for they are the same men
who threw you out of your home in Yathrib. Their bone-chilling shouts
of "Allahu Akbar" pierce your soul. Before you can run, the
mercenaries swarm at you from every direction. They continue to howl
as one thrusts a sword into your father's flesh; they torture your
husband, building a fire on his chest, ultimately decapitating him.
They murder your father. Then they shackle your cousins, hauling them
away to become sex slaves. They ransack your home and strip the
clothes off your family as they lay dying, all in a frenzied quest
for booty.

Hiding behind a door, you're terrified. Then it happens. One of
the Muslims spots you; a crazed demonic lust explodes on his face. He
knocks you down, pressing his knee against your back while he ties
your hands to your neck. You can hardly breathe. It's the worst
moment of your life. The filthy, lice-ridden militant fondles you,
dragging you past the bloodied bodies of your neighbors; you want to
cry, to scream, but nothing comes out.

Then you see Muhammad, the man you've grown to hate, the
repulsive sixty-year-old animal responsible for this horror. He
claims you as his "prize," tossing his cloak over your head. His
words, his very presence, make your skin crawl. But as his slave you
are helpless. He strips you of whatever little dignity you have left.
Then he conquers your body just as he ravaged your people.
Now, consider the insanity of a man who claimed to be "the
Messenger of God" raping a woman whose town he had terrorized,
savaged, plundered, and enslaved. How could a man claim to be
a "prophet" and yet be so demonic and sadistic, he would force a
woman to have sex with him whose husband he had tortured and then
beheaded, whose father he had assassinated, and whose cousins he
had "given in trade" to one of his militants so that he might possess

The problem with Muhammad isn't that he was the most vile bastard
who ever lived; it's his legacy. He perpetrated these heinous crimes
while claiming to be "the best example," "the ideal role model," an
Apostle speaking on behalf of God. This demented criminal established
a new religion that has damned the souls of over two billion people;
he inspired terrorism, and has led the world to the brink of global

I do not know if any part of the following is accurate. However,
if there is an element of truth, it was too little, too late. Every
Jewish settlement within Muhammad's reach had already been terrorized
and plundered. Bukhari:V5B59N551 "When Khaybar was conquered, a
sheep containing poison, was given as a present to Allah's Apostle"
Tabari VIII:123/Ishaq:516 "When the Messenger rested from his labor
[which says that terrorism and piracy were his chosen occupation],
Zaynab, the wife of Sallam, served him a roast sheep. She had asked
what part Muhammad liked best and was told that it was the shoulder
and foreleg. So she loaded it with poison, also poisoning the rest.
Then she placed it before him. He took the foreleg and chewed it, but
he did not swallow. With him was Bishr, who, like the Prophet, took
some, but he swallowed it. The Prophet spat out the lamb
saying, `This bone informs me that it has been poisoned.'"
Talking bones and a gluttonous man spitting out his favorite
celebratory meal are a little farfetched. But there was a reason for
including the story. The cook was a Jew. The tale was concocted to
infer that Khaybar deserved to be sacked. No one had bothered to
provide any justification for the initial attack.

"Muhammad summoned the woman, and she confessed. He asked, `What
led you to do this?'" This goon claimed he was a prophet, and yet he
couldn't figure this one out. Good grief. It's like Hitler asking a
Polish Jew why he wanted him dead. "She said, `You know full well
what you have done to my people.'" It was as if Muhammad was
surprised when folks were upset with his terrorist tactics. Caught up
in his make-believe world, he had lost all sense of reality.

This next Hadith is mindless propaganda.

Tabari VIII:124/Ishaq:516 "The Messenger, during the illness from which he
died, said to the mother of Bishr who had come in to visit him, `Umm,
at this very moment I feel my aorta being severed because of the food
I ate with your son at Khaybar.'" Sure, that makes perfect sense. The
poison he spit out years before killed him. "The Muslims believed
that in addition to the honor of prophethood, the Messenger died a
martyr.'" Well, at least we know the reason for this sorry tale.
Muslims who don't die martyrs have no chance of paradise. The
cowardly terrorist needed to miscast his personal history to die a
worthy death.

Tabari VIII:124/Ishaq:516/Bukhari:V5B59N541 "Having finished with
Khaybar, the Apostle went to Wadi Qura and besieged its people for a
while. Then we headed back to Medina, halting at Qura toward sunset.
With Muhammad was a slave lad of his whom Rifa'ah had given him.
Suddenly, as we were setting down the saddle of the Prophet, a stray
arrow came and hit the slave boy, killing him. We congratulated him,
saying, `May he enjoy Paradise!' But Allah's Apostle said, `Certainly
not! The sheet of cloth on his back is now being burnt on him in the
Hell Fire!' He pilfered it from the booty of the Muslims following
the Khaybar raid before it was duly distributed." You apparently
aren't allowed to steal anything that's already been stolen.

And there's a significant conflict between Muhammad's personal
example and the rallying cry of the Nation of Islam as they lure
African Americans into their ranks. Muhammad not only enslaved people
and built Islam on money "earned" selling people into bondage, he
himself owned slaves. Boys were personal servants and girls were for
personal services.

A poem recited this day proclaims: Ishaq:517 "Khaybar was stormed
by the Apostle's squadron, fully armed, powerful, and strong. It
brought certain humiliation with Muslim men in its midst. We attacked
and they met their doom. Muhammad conquered the Jews in fighting that
day as they opened their eyes to our dust." It's hardly sermon

But sadly, imams have been preaching the following message for
far too long: Ishaq:518 "Masud was one of those who found martyrdom
at Khaybar. Muhammad said, `He has with him now his two dark-eyed
virgins. When a martyr is slain, his two virgins pet him, wiping the
dust from his face. They say, "May Allah throw dust on the face of
the man who did this to you, and slay him who slew you!"'" It's the
antithesis of Christ's: "Love your enemies."

In the next installment of Islamic scripture, a Muslim deceives
the Quraysh to collect his belongings. What's interesting is that
Muhammad gave him permission to lie and disavow Islam for money.
Ishaq:519 "Hajjaj said to the Apostle, `I have money scattered among
the Meccan merchants, so give me permission to go and get it.' Having
got Muhammad's permission, he said, `I must tell lies.' The Apostle
said, `Tell them.'" Muhammad didn't heed Yahweh's command not to bear
false witness. This prophet spit on the Ten Commandments. As a
result, the Islamic world cannot build a productive economy or
develop a stable democracy. The currency for both is trust. The
spirit of deceit still haunts Muslims.

The division of the "Spoils of Khaybar" was so important to the
formation of Islam that both Ishaq and Tabari dedicate entire
sections to it. One line in particular reveals Muhammad's motivation
for attacking the Jews. Tabari VIII:128 "Khaybar was divided among
the people who had been at Hudaybiyah." Each time Muhammad's
mercenaries got down on him, he plundered Jews. This was no
exception. The prophet redeemed himself for having been disgraced at
Hudaybiyah; he quieted his critics by sharing the booty from an easy
kill. Ishaq:521 "Khaybar was apportioned among the men of Hudaybiyah
without regard to whether they were present at Khaybar or not. The
spoil was divided into 1,800 shares."

This Ishaq Hadith reveals where the booty went. Ishaq:521 "When
the spoil of Khaybar was apportioned, the settlements of Shaqq and
Nata were given to the Muslims while Katiba was divided into five
sections: Allah's fifth [which Muhammad was custodian]; the Prophet's
fifth; the share to the kindred [Muhammad's kin]; maintenance of the
Prophet's wives [now there's an honest report]; and payment to the
men who acted as intermediaries in the peace negotiation with Fadak
[which enabled the Profit to confiscate the entire spoil]." Instead
of a religious awakening, it was a repulsive accounting.

Ishaq:522 "Then the Apostle distributed the booty between his
relatives, his wives, and to other men and women. He gave his
daughter Fatima 200 shares, Ali 100, Usama 250, Aisha 200, Bakr 100,
Aqil ibn Abu Talib 140…. In the name of Allah, Ar-Rahman, Ar-Rahim-
this is a memorandum of what Muhammad the Apostle of Allah gave his
wives from the dates and wheat of Khaybar: 180 loads." The Hadith
lists additional special favors and bequeaths but I'll spare you the
gory details.

The first Islamic historian said, Tabari VIII:130 "The Prophet
conquered Khaybar by force after fighting. Khaybar was something that
Allah gave as booty to His Messenger. He took one-fifth of it and
divided the remainder among the Muslims. The inhabitants who
surrendered did so on condition that they should be expelled." Tabari
VIII:129 "After the Messenger had finished with the Khaybar Jews,
Allah cast terror into the hearts of the Jews in Fadak when they
received news of what Allah had brought upon Khaybar. So they sent to
Muhammad to make peace with him for a half share of Fadak's produce.
Fadak became the exclusive property of Allah's Messenger." Peace
Islamic style means surrender. And surrender means giving Muhammad

Continuing to impugn its claim of tolerance, the Islamic
scripture reveals: Tabari VIII:130 "The Messenger said during his
final illness, `Two religions cannot coexist in the Arabian
Peninsula.' Umar investigated the matter, then sent to the Jews,
saying: `Allah has given permission for you to be expelled; for I
have received word that the Prophet said that two religions cannot
coexist in Arabia." Ishaq:524 "We cannot accept the oaths of Jews.
Their infidelity is so great they swear falsely."

Bukhari also chronicled the dispensation of stolen property. Here
is a sampling: Bukhari:V5B59N525 "While we were besieging Khaybar a
person threw a leather container containing some fat and I ran to
take it. Suddenly I looked behind, and behold! The Prophet was there.
So I felt shy (to take it then)." Bukhari:V5B59N537 "On the day of
Khaybar, Allah's Apostle divided the war booty with the ratio of two
shares for the horse and one-share for the foot soldier."

Bukhari:V5B59N541 "When we conquered Khaybar, we gained neither gold
nor silver as booty, but we gained cows, camels, goods and
gardens." Bukhari:V5B59N544 "Abu Huraira came to the Prophet and
asked him for a share from the Khaybar booty. `O Allah's Apostle! Do
not give it to him. He is a strange guinea pig from Qadum Ad-Dan!' On
that the Prophet said, `O sit down!' and did not give him a share."

Bukhari:V5B59N547 "When Khaybar was conquered, we said, `Now we will
eat our fill of dates!'" There are many more, but you get the
picture. Islam was a "religion" only in the sense that it became one
man's license to steal from many.

Swimming in the blood and plunder of Khaybar didn't satisfy the
sharks. Instead, Muhammad's militants went off on a feeding frenzy.
Tabari VIII:131 "Allah's Apostle sent Umar with thirty men against
the rear of Hawazin. They traveled by night and hid by day. However,
word reached Hawazin and they fled." Tabari VIII:132 "According to
Waqidi, a thirty-man raiding party led by Bahir went to the Banu
Murrah. His companions were killed and he was carried away wounded
with the dead. They returned to Medina." So… "The Messenger sent
Abdallah al-Kalbi to the land of the Murrah. During the raid, Usamah
and one of the Ansar killed Mirdas. When they overcame him, Usamah
said, `I testify that there is no god but Allah,' but we killed him

Tabari VIII:133 "The raiding party led by Ghalib went to Abd
Tha'labah. One of Muhammad's slaves, said, `Prophet, I know where the
Abd can be taken by surprise.' So Muhammad sent him with Ghalib and
130 men. They raided Abd, and drove off camels and sheep, bringing
them back to Medina." Stealing sheep does not make one a shepherd.
Then: Tabari VIII:133 "A raiding party led by Bahir went to Yumn.
What prompted this raiding party was that Hussayl had been the guide
of Muhammad at Khaybar, and he came before the Prophet. He claimed
that the Ghatafan had been summoned to march against him. The Muslims
went out and captured camels and sheep. A slave belonging to Uyaynah
met them, and they killed him. Then they encountered Uyaynah's army
which retreated."

So Muhammad returned to Mecca. Tabari VIII:135/Ishaq:530 "When
the Apostle returned from Khaybar he sent out raiding parties and
expeditions before he made the hajj. When the Meccans heard of it
they got out of the Muslims' way. Gathering at the door of the
assembly house to look at them, they said, `Muhammad and his
Companions are in poverty and misery; they are covetous and
miserly.'" From the very beginning the Meccans understood Muhammad
and Islam.

The warlord made a beeline for Allah's House. Ishaq:530 "The
Prophet stroked and kissed the Black Stone. Then he went out trotting
around the Ka'aba as did his Companions. When the Temple concealed
Muhammad from the Meccans and he had "istalama" (which means to
embrace, stroke, and kiss) the southern corner of the Ka'aba, he
walked to "istalama" the Black Stone a second time. Then he "harwala"
(which means to trot or prance swinging the shoulders side to side in
a gloating manner) similarly for three circumambulations. He walked
the remainder of them. The Apostle only did this to show off in front
of the Quraysh." It was so pagan and childish of him.

Muhammad not only kissed, fondled, and trotted around a Black
Stone wedged into the wall of a pagan rock shrine replete with 360
other idols, he claimed this exhibition was Islamic "Sunnah." As
such, the practice became obligatory Islamic ritual with the binding
power of law. Ishaq:531 "When the Prophet made his farewell
pilgrimage he adhered to the practice making it required Sunnah to be
carried out forever." While Muhammad had not yet stolen their town,
he had usurped their idol and their religion.

A poem from that black day says: Ishaq:530 "Get out of his way
you infidel unbelievers. Every good thing goes with His Apostle. O
Lord I believe in his word. We will fight you about its
interpretations as we have fought you about its revelation with
strokes that will remove heads from shoulders. And we will make
enemies of friends." The Meccans were being told to get out of
Muhammad's way and yet it was their town, their god, their shrine,
and their religious scam. Muhammad's example, as communicated through
the Hadith, is being called "good." That means terrorist raids,
piracy, the slave trade, torture, assassinations, mass murder,
deception, bribery and rape are all "good things" in Islam.

The line, "I believe in his word" can only be interpreted two
ways, and both are bad. Either the Qur'an was comprised of Muhammad's
words, as "his" isn't capitalized and follows a reference to the
Apostle, or these Hadiths are being acknowledged as "scripture"-words
to be "believed."

The means Muslims said they would use to win the debate over
Muhammad's interpretation of Qusayy's scam and his claim to have
received Allah's revelations would be swords, not words. The religion
was too foolish, and the first Muslims were too ruthless, to impose
the doctrine any other way. Islam, properly deployed, severs heads
and turns friends into enemies.

Tabari VIII:138 "According to Waqidi, Muhammad carried arms,
helmets, and spears. He led a hundred horses, appointing Bahir to be
in charge of the weapons and Maslamah to be in charge of the horses.
When the Quraysh received word of this, it frightened them. The
Prophet said, `Young or old, I have never been known but for keeping
a promise. I do not want to bring in weapons against you, but the
weapons will be close to me.'" So, which story is untrue? This Hadith
says Muhammad never went back on a promise, but the Qur'an says:

009.003 "And an announcement from Allah and His Messenger to the
people on the day of the Great Pilgrimage is that Allah and His
Messenger dissolve treaty obligations with the Pagans." So who was
lying, prophet, god, or both?

When a sufficient number of Americans can answer the following
question, we will be on the road to protecting ourselves from Islam:
What kind of religion causes people to think that terrorizing,
mutilating, and murdering is a good thing to do?


Home India World Religion Dewanism Hinduism Christianity Islam Technology Gaschamber Literature Poetry Love Youtube Pictures Trash Hindu links Main links Forum links Publishing Public Letters Guestbook00 Disclaimer Contact

Critical Podium Dewanand

All rights reserved.